Bridge 3 Building Unit complete poster
Research questions:
Built in the 1960s, during the country’s building boom, after the depression and World War II, Stuyvesant Park Residence, like the ever changing social and political issues we face, has transformed with time. This residence known as a home to New School students since 2009, was once a home to medical residents, and before that may have even been a home for a new generation of civilians fighting for their rights, has almost completely transformed interiorly just like it’s residence.
Unlike the occupants of this building, the building is here to stay. Made in an era where modern architecture was only just starting to become the new trend, this cement building is deigned minimally, made to fit it’s function, which was housing those that needed a home, such as the young men and women, seeking a place to stay at in NYC. With its plain walls, and minimal furniture this building provides basic needs to its residents. The major changes in the interior have mostly been the interior division of the building, seeing as hospital residents would need more space than average college students, the suites were made smaller, allowing as many college students as possible to live in the building.
When this building came about the civil rights movement was at its peak! People of all genders and races were taking the streets, demanding basic rights of others and their own, including equal pay. World war II was at its end, and African Americans were not ready to have their economic situations worsen, so they demanded equal pay. Even housing was limited to African Americans, specifically in Stuyvesant Town, close to my dorm, where African Americans were denied to live. On paper everyone had their rights, but in reality they didn’t.
If you take a look at the New School residents living in Stuyvesant Park, you would say we have come a long way since then. As Stuyvesant Park Residence is nothing like what Stuyvesant Town was. When you look at NYC today unfortunately, not much has changed since then, New York being New York, a place people of all genders, backgrounds, and identities there is always someone being discriminated against. What I want to know is what is the New School’s part in all of this? When did those living in this side of Manhattan finally accept this social change? Is this social change, occurring uptown? Would an apartment uptown have a completely different dynamic? And would those living there be as socially accepting as those at the New School Residence? What I really want to know is if I’m living in a bubble, sheltered from extreme discrimination?
In order to get the answers I need, I would require more than some research online, I would need to venture it into different areas in Manhattan; I would need to question those who live there, those who have witnessed discrimination first hand or those who have even been the victim of discrimination. I would need qualitative research. Observing people is also a huge part of that; a person interactions with others, especially those of different genders or races says a lot.
Interview:
With not much to go by, other than word of mouth, and barely any research findings I entered the office of Marsha Dawson, wanting any sort of information about the building I’ve been living in for the past several months. She seemed to be the person that seemed to know most about this buildings past, including the name of the real estate agent, who had bought this building, after the hospital had no choice but to sell it due to the rising, real estate prices in NYC. Student housing was very much in demand, and so this proved to be a good investment opportunity. All I needed was any bit of information that would lead me to the answers I was seeking online. I left her office, knowing one thing; this building was a home for hospital employees, one of which, to this day, lives in the apartment right beside me. With this information in mind I found one answer after another, regarding Stuyvesant Park’s history, formally known as Booth house.
My first interviewee was no one other than Marsha, as the area coordinator Marsha, a grad student and employee, was provided with a fully furnished apartment, interiorly organized more like an apartment rather than a student suite. When asked how this building accommodated her needs she seemed to have conflicted feeling, saying that she enjoyed the accessibility, being in Greenwich village and all, and the security of the unit, but also saying that knowing ones boundaries was a major challenge, as the line between work, her public life, and home, her private life, was blurred. In order for this building to accommodate her needs more she would need her own entrance or a back entrance to her apartment as an employee. When answering what sort of change she would like to see for the building as a whole she made a few great points, one of which, regarded the lack of sustainability efforts in the dorm, such as the under grown back garden, which I do agree is very unappealing due to it’s neglect. Still, as a young unmarried women in NYC, living and working in this apartment is an appropriate situation for now.
Other than Marsha’s specific needs her opinions were similar to those of students, especially regarding the location of this building. Zain, a student staying at Stuyvesant Residence found this building to be a suitable place for her lifestyle because of how close the location of this building is to the University Center, and any other necessities such as supermarkets and restaurants. Surrounded by students her age Zain feels like this building was an appropriate choice for her as a first year student, a place she could stay at and be able to familiarize herself with the east village at the same time, but still complained about the lack of space in her actual bedroom, not including the shared suite space. For the dorm as a whole she hoped the gym could be more spacious and open, and that and that a cafeteria be made available to the students, which I agree with completely, seeing as the main cafeteria is a good fifteen to thirty minute walk from the building, and students are required to pay for a meal plan.
A feature of this building that I am most thankful for is he availability of 24 hour security guards on different shifts, one of which I interviewed. This security guard does not live in the building, but spends a good amount of time in it’s lobby, making her familiar with one of the most important areas of the building. A lobby is a place that gives the building’s visitors, or potential students a first impression. What the security guard seemed to passionately discuss was her hate for the red wall directly in front of her, sarcastically saying how her request to paint the wall blue or green was immediately rejected, which I found funny because the New School have certainly made a strange decision regarding the red theme. Positively, the security went on to say that she liked the area, the surrounding restaurants, and being able to sit in Stuyvesant Park during the summer on her breaks.
I can surely agree that Stuyvesant Park is located in one of the most central areas in Manhattan, but can also agree that this building does not provide students with as much accommodations as it should, considering the fees students are paying.