PROJECT 3 book final

IMG_2422

IMG_2421IMG_2420

Lina

When I started working on the project I really didn’t understand the concepts fully. I read and re-read the Deleuze reading to get a better understanding. I did outside research but it wasn’t until I started visualizing what I was reading.

For the liqueous perception image, this is what I understood:

Also known as the subjective Image

Where image in film are organized around a distinct center

A character

Not necessarily a person or animal or an object

But a subject

For the gaseous perception image:

Also known as the objective image

Where images are interacting with each other without creating a subject

There is no center

No character

These are also the text that I included on the lenticular (two pictures folded in accordion fashion). I wanted to keep the text simple and clean so I used variations of Helvetica Neue. Helvetica Neue thin for the informational text, and Helvetica Neue bold for the questions. I made the color of the text same to the color of the opposite picture. I decided to keep the boxes white because I prefer the box framing the text and the text feathering out of the image.

I chose the red photo for the gaseous image because it conveyed a long shot but also distorted it. Since the gaseous image is also about the montage, I used a screenshot of a montage. Because it’s between scenes, it had over lap so the image wasn’t really clear, thanks to this it further exemplifies the location with out a character. So I thought that it was the perfect representation of perception image.

I used the same location for the second photo because using the same setting is a lot more effective at showing the difference between two parts of the same theory. I chose the blue hue with the girl looking at her phone for the liqueous image specifically. This is for many reasons, one, there is a central character. It’s a girl looking down and into her phone, with the little with the red on the exit sign there’s just a little bit of exposition. It sets up her as a character and as the center. I also chose blue because it added to the sadness, and because I wanted a sharp contrast to the red.

 

 

Audio

Lina Lee

https://soundcloud.com/leelina44/nightmare-before-wakeup

Nightmare Before Wakeup

 

When we first got the assignment I knew immediately that I wanted to do something that had to do with dreams. I started researching dreams and dream analysis. I read about Freudian vs Jungian analysis, I didn’t delve into the neo-freudian or the neo-jungian for simplicity’s sake. I found out about dream analysis, where the analyst (a step up from a therapist) would listen to the patient’s dream and let the patient work out what the dream was about. In away, they used dreams as a way to delve into the patient’s subconscious. I learned about the four stages of REM sleep; sleep onset, light sleep and stage deep sleep and deeper sleep.

Originally I wanted my audio to be about waking up from a dream. But I realized that the dream needed to be specific so I choose the audio to be about waking up from a nightmare.

I wanted the structure of the video to be; deep sleep to waking up to consciousness. To achieve that I used recordings of my step dad half asleep. I had about 12 or so voice recordings of my step dad half conscious, so I knew I had some editing to do. I listened to the 12 or so tracks I have of his voice and edited out parts that were cleaner and parts where there were prolonged talking. This condensed about 5 hours of recording to about 30 bite sized video bits. I acquired the alarm tone and the ‘heavy breathing’ from online. I spent about a week walking around and recording whatever seemed relevant to the project from that I acquired the room ton and the bed crumpling noise. For the room tone, I used a recording of a siren from my room. FOr the bed crumpling noise, I left the recorder on a couple of times while I was making the bed.

Editing was interesting. I realized that lynda has the answers, but I had to weed through a massive amount of information in order to get to a simple answer. So I used a combination of lynda and adobe forms. Mostly I used the speed tool to play with the speed and tone of the sounds. I used Channel Volume to make transitions smoother and the volumes reasonably level where it was suppose to be. I used the razor tool to make cuts where I wanted to the second, this by far was the most useful tool I learned. For example, I had gotten the ‘heavy breathing’ clip from online, I wanted to make it longer so I cut and pasted a part of the ‘heavy breathing’ to the full heavy breathing audio to make it longer and more believable. I used pan during the dream sequence the most to make it feel like the sounds were coming from different sides of the room.  

In relation to Cheon’s modes of listening I used both Reduced and Causal listening. Throughout the dream sequence, there is speech that’s slowed down, you can’t really tell if someone’s talking or if it’s noise. I would say this aspect of the audio byte involves Reduced listening, because the words in the speech isn’t what matters–it’s the mood that the drawling voice gives. I used my dad saying “Maybe it’s karma, maybe it’s…” throughout the dream sequence as well, these words don’t really have a meaning in their own. The words are used to set the mood of the piece and get information about what’s going on inside of the dreamer’s mind.

Both audio bites from online are from freeaudio.com

Video+Sound final

https://youtu.be/cAYICwlqJUY

Lina Lee

Time: Metropolis

Video+Sound

When I first got started on the video and the sound portion of the project it was a bit daunting. When I was creating the video, instead of working on top of the audio and muting, I started a new project. This is because when I was working on top of the audio, even though it was muted, I kept trying to sync the video to the audio. The format of the audio is in a dream, waking up; thus, the video followed that.

I copied and pasted the audio to the video file, and listened to it with our editing it first. I realized that even though they were created separately, when put together, it worked. Not a lot of things need to be changed. The best part of, the firstness and secondness, and the modes of listening didn’t need to be compromised as much as I feared. In the bed, neither the video nor the sound changed much when it was combined.

Of course certain parts need to be cut and re-transitioned. Such as the audio’s breathing, it was much too long for the video, and the figure in the video wasn’t trembling as much as the sound was implying. Instead of a long audio bite of breathing, I broke it up to match the figure when on the bed and when the figure first got off. I also had to sync when the person woke up in the video to the audio. It was evident that the audio had a larger emphasis on the nightmare and the video had a larger emphasis on the conscious stage. Which all in all helped the final product to feel more balanced between the waking and the dreaming states together.

Time Project 3

So I wanted to do work based on dreams.

I knew I had footage of my dad half a sleep so I wanted to use that.

I learned how air drop things straight to my computer from my phone.

I spent the whole last week just rolling around and recording things that could be useful.

I ended up using a combination of both the recordings I had of my dad, but I cut and slowed his voice down and used repetition of the phrase “maybe it’s karma”

Screen Shot 2015-10-07 at 5.04.07 PM Screen Shot 2015-10-07 at 5.04.17 PM Screen Shot 2015-10-07 at 5.49.37 PM