In the article we still talk about machine learning and the relationship between machine-machine and human-machine. The fact is, AI today can already beat human in plenty areas. And AI is stealing information for our social media and every action we make in our daily life. So my question is, when machine-learning become emotional-learning, where’s future for human?
It’s long been known that AI and automation/robotics will change markets and workforces. And people keep insisting that AI cannot take place of human because it can only calculate data instead of having emotions. However, AI technology is still in developing and we don’t know how intelligent it could be.
Developers of artificial intelligence claim that it is to be more than just a copy of smart products; they claim to copy the intelligence process (this has been called a powerful AI location, a term invented by the philosopher John Searle). In other words, they not only claim that computers are smart, they are as smart as people. All of a sudden, the debate was not just a philosophical issue, but psychology entered the picture. If smart computers are produced, can they be considered working models of human intelligence? So far all computers, systems like GPS (see the previous section for more details) are blind rule followers, what do you think about human intelligence? If we accept that they are smart, will they necessarily be the clever way to follow us? These are important issues for psychologists and philosophers as well as computer scientists. Importantly, when people start asking “the machine can think,” psychology is inextricably linked with artificial intelligence. This is the position it holds and was strengthened in 50 years.
