Critical design as Constructive Provocation
- Vu actively states the importance of critical design in response to social, political, and world issues
- There is a growing interest in creative movements that push specific agendas
- Problem with CD being perceived as following an agenda is that it has colonialistic connotations.
- If critical design turns mainstream, it loses its soul. If you want it to be understood by many people, how can it keep its soul?
- She shows different objects, each taking an object we already know, and flips it on its head with a specific message.
- These objects are trying to make an impact, rather than other products that just exist in the world.
- Makes the invisible visible – Highlights social issues, opens discourse, says “This is problematic, why is it?”
- Question present conditions
Dunne and Raby, What is Critical Design?
- About taking objects we already know and flipping them on their head, while retaining the original function.
- More of an idea or attitude than a method for creating
- Came From Italian Radical Design of the 1970s
- One of the foundations of critical design
- First use of “Critical Design” in Anthony Dunne’s book Hertzian Tales (1999)
- What’s it for
- Think outside the box
- Spark curiosity about a topic outside the social norms and creating solutions to those issues
- Create tension between the creator of the design and the audience
- Not a movement, can’t be neatly defined
- About Values and attitude, looking at design and imagining “possibilities beyond the narrow definitions of what is presented through media”
- Related to:
- activism, cautionary tales, conceptual design, contestable futures, design fiction, interrogative design, radical design, satire, social fiction & speculative design
- Biggest Misconceptions:
- That it is negative, jokey, fake, not aesthetical, has no power of changing anything, and is against everything.Critical Design is not art
- Critical Design is more disturbing and continuously changing
http://https://vimeo.com/169936495