The Edges of Personality
Is there any coherence to the human mind?
As we study the biological structure of the brain we can grow to understand the proximity of the cerebellum to the cerebrum and the relation of the cranial nerves to the corpus callosum.
When we delve into the study of psychoanalysis we come into one of the most complex studies the human mind could we could enter. We attempt to unravel the multiple layers of psychology. This dynamic study of the mind can not be seen. Its implications, however, in terms of the law are structured within the barrios of black and white. Psychoanalysis is a study that transcends the limits of human understanding. As I begin to explore the twisted nature of criminology and how it is inextricably linked with personality, it is yet to be seen whether a conclusion on the subject is possible or not.
Is it possible for something as complex as the criminal mind to be controlled within the parameters of law?
Crime could be defined as an act that deserves punishment in the eyes of society. Countering this is law, a convention adopted for the uphold what we consider to be a well regulated society. The two go hand in hand and form an inextricable link to one another.
Due to the complexity of psychology, the only way we are allowed access into the criminal mind is though layers and layers of interrogatory techniques that propel the thoughts of the victim outward towards our understanding.
The construct of criminology lies between two theories. While it could be influenced by external conditions such as alcoholism and poverty, it could also be inextricably linked to an individual by virtue of genetics. The defect is only known to the individual and it is a mission to allow for its reveal.
While there is no definite criminal type, if this doth be a disease we carve the path of diagnosis. In the words of Smith M. Hemblin, it is but ‘the light from the stormy road which we have to travel.’ He continues to make the profound statement, ‘The very last thing which a man desires to understand is himself.’
We thus commence our journey towards its disentanglement.
Our attempt at unlocking the secrets of the human mind involves exposing the realm of the unconscious mind.
Hypnotism allows for the subject’s consciousness to be completely obliterated with their memory of forgotten events improving greatly. There are, however, obvious objections to its use as it doesn’t fall under the umbrella of psychoanalysis making it as convoluted as the subject concerned.
Word Association is a powerful technique that aims at interacting with the subject through a quick exchange of words, constantly probing the unconscious towards formulating a greater understanding. In this case, the responses of the subject are noted along with paying attention to the time taken for the response. Peculiar reactions are noted carefully and further propel our understanding of psychology. It is not, however, as simple as it seems. If we begin to formulate our own theories towards what the subject’s complexes are, we are certain to be led astray.
Free Association is another technique of psychoanalysis that suspends the subjects thoughts to only then narrate any memory or thought that comes in relation to his/her symptoms.
The Interpretation of Dreams, often referred to as the ‘royal road to the unconscious,’ can be viewed under a scientific approach. Freud describes how each dream is the fulfillment of both conscious as well as unconscious wishes. It is where the unconscious desires produce mental disturbances. The displacement, condensation and symbolization hold a magnitude of meaning all reasoning the greater subject of distortion.
Consulting all the above theories, it is up to the psychoanalyst to break down the resistances which keep the repressed complexes in the unconscious. It is only when the resistances are broken down that the complexities reveal their own identities. The rise of the complexes to the consciousness, detaching the nucleus from its surrounding emotions into fresh channels.
After analyzing all the interrogatory techniques, we understand that they are themselves experimental. There is a lot of conjecture that is used to develop these theories to eventually formulate answers. These loose ends fail to carve their path towards a definite direction. Most importantly, I believe that it is the instinct of the psychoanalyst that can guide the study in order to formulate answers. The course of the study progresses along multiple shades of grey coloring in the lines of understanding. It is therefore evident that there is never any one way of going about this. Not one of the interrogatory techniques listed above has the ability to assure secure and accurate conclusions.
An example of interrogatory techniques going wrong revolves around the classic case of murderer Kenneth Bianchi, a criminal who faked his mental disorder. While under hypnosis, Bianchi convinced several respected experts that it wasn’t he who committed the murder of a dozen women, but his alter ego “Steve.” Had his diagnosis of multiple personality disorder been enforced, Bianchi would have been allowed to plead not guilty by virtue of insanity. According to statistics ‘out of those assessed for a psychiatric disorder, about 7% are believed to be faking.’
This instinctive process and development of the human mind is, however, contradicted by the stark nature of law that divides its course into the definite colors of black and white, allowing for a structured and almost restrictive body.
As I read ‘Criminal Law,’ by Jonathan Herring I began to study the contrast of the parallel diversion of law and order. It defines crime only to establish a punishment. Is it possible for something as complex as the criminal mind to be controlled within the parameters of law? Insanity has never been defined legally.
One of the most fascinating and horrifying criminal activity in existence revolves around the case of Ian Brady the ‘Moors Murderer.’ Raised by foster parents in Glasgow’s toughest slums, Brady’s unstable personality was the cause of an unstable upbringing. He had a strange fascination with the Nazis and the writings of Nietsche. His devious deeds of having killed five children caused a magnitude of uprising and resonates his villainy. Instead of remaining behind bars, Brady’s sentence was shifted to the high security psychiatric institution of Ashworth due to a diagnosis based on mental illness. It was only in the year 2013 that Brady has claimed that to have been a proficient display of method acting.
This is an astounding and convoluted display of human behavior. To think that an individual would try to overcome punishment by hiding behind the twisted shackles of criminology and insanity. This gives rise to many questions particularly concerning its association with the law. Is it possible to fake having a mental defect? Is it right for the law to adapt itself towards insanity when any of act of that magnitude can only be committed by someone insane regardless of mental illness coming into the picture?
Can the law, rigid as it is, ever define this complexity of the human mind?
Here lies a very fine line. My conclusion resides in the fact that it is up to you, the reader, to draw up your own resolution on the matter. The vagueness clouds our vision and displays a great deal of grey matter. If I were to conjure up a result of my study it would be to define a middle ground between the distorted shards of psychology and the concrete hardness of the law. I will therefore allow the thought to linger in the midst of your memory as this contradiction serves to be one of the most prevalent in our time.
Any act of criminality is insanity in itself. It does not need to be defined by an illness and be adapted under the structure of law.
The argument on the subject continues.