Students: please help draft the rubric.
We are supposed to have a rubric so that you have an idea of how I grade these projects. While a lot of planning goes into developing the course so that everyone can fish for a lifetime, there have to be standards for accountability.
This is one such attempt. I would like for you to think about these categories and evaluation criteria, and give me feedback that would add or subtract or help me make them more clear.
Email me with suggestions.
Thanks, onno
Midterm Rubric |
above expectations |
at expectations |
needs work |
below expectations |
| Volume of work | Additional pages or exquisitely done pages. Complete website | Fully functional front page, product page and bio page. | Pages are not fully functional and incomplete. | Pages missing or too incomplete to be functional. |
| Technical Ability | Is innovative and uses User Experience guidelines and clear site architecture to develop engaging web site. | HTML is semantic and validates. Various CSS strategies are used to layout the website. | Code has errors but still works. | Code does not work. |
| Clean Design | Design is consistent with clear design elements throughout; Design tied to meaning; Nothing irrelevant, everything has a purpose. | Design satisfies the requirement. Communicates its intent and is clear | Design is simplistic and does not add anything to the communication. | Design hampers the communication. |
| Research | The portfolio is well situated and targets all potential users. | The portfolio is well thought out from the artist’s point of view. Additional research did not broaden the horizon. | The portfolio demonstrates artist’s perspective, but lacks general appeal. | Lack of research shows up in product that is not clearly defined for any audience. |